State, Department of Transportation v. Warriner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, Department of Transportation v. Warriner

893 So. 2d 608, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2005 WL 229990

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 1D04-0153·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

Appellant, State of Florida, Department of Transportation (DOT), challenges an order awarding attorney’s fees. DOT asserts that the trial court erred in regard to its determination of entitlement to fees as well as the amount awarded. We find no [609]*609error as to the trial court’s determination as to entitlement. We decline to address DOT’s issue concerning lack of notice prior to the court determining the amount of fees, 'as this issue was never presented to the trial court. The attorney’s fee award is affirmed.

KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, C.J.

Appellant, State of Florida, Department of Transportation (DOT), challenges an order awarding attorney’s fees. DOT asserts that the trial court erred in regard to its determination of entitlement to fees as well as the amount awarded. We find no [609]*609error as to the trial court’s determination as to entitlement. We decline to address DOT’s issue concerning lack of notice prior to the court determining the amount of fees, 'as this issue was never presented to the trial court. The attorney’s fee award is affirmed.

KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

State, Department of Transportation v. Warriner, 893 So. 2d 608, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, 2005 WL 229990 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

893 So. 2d 608 (State, Department of Transportation v. Warriner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related