State, Department of Transportation v. Cone Bros. Contracting Co.

265 So. 2d 63
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 1972·No. P-500·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court has reviewed the record, briefs and heard oral argument, and we are of the opinion and so hold that the trial court did correctly construe the pertinent paragraphs of the Specifications in question, and that the appellant was bound, at least, by an implied warranty that the materials in question were suitable for the job which was the subject of the contract between appellant and appellee. The verdict and judgment are therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and JOHNSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Department of Transportation v. Cone Bros. Contracting Co., 265 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

265 So. 2d 63 (State, Department of Transportation v. Cone Bros. Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. LAW Contracting Corp.
481 So. 2d 1290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)