State, Department of Transportation v. Anderson Columbia Co.

651 So. 2d 1267, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2493
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1995·No. Nos. 94-2834, 94-2914, 94-2997, 94-3043·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated interlocutory appeals and petitions for writs of prohibition challenge the jurisdiction of the circuit court to enter orders enjoining the Department of Transportation from awarding road construction contracts to White Construction Company during the pendency of administrative proceedings initiated by Anderson Columbia to protest the bid proceedings on the basis that .White was not the lowest responsible bidder. We agree with the Department’s position that the circuit court erred in exercising subject-matter jurisdiction over the cause, as Anderson had an adequate administrative remedy available to it under chapter 120. See State ex rel. Department of General Services v. Willis, 344 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).1 Accordingly, we vacate the orders granting injunctive relief and grant the petitions for writs of prohibition.

ZEHMER, C.J., DAVIS, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Department of Transportation v. Anderson Columbia Co., 651 So. 2d 1267, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 1267 (State, Department of Transportation v. Anderson Columbia Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Fish and Wildlife Com'n v. Pringle
770 So. 2d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Henry v. State
651 So. 2d 1267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)