State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Vidrine

517 So. 2d 898, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10368, 1987 WL 801
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 7, 1987
DocketNo. 86-831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 517 So. 2d 898 (State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Vidrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Vidrine, 517 So. 2d 898, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10368, 1987 WL 801 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion matter entitled State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development v. Aswell, 517 So.2d 894 (La.App. 3d Cir.1987), the judgment of the trial court is reversed and set aside and defendants’ motion to dismiss the expropriation is dismissed with prejudice. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings with regard to the payment of compensation to the defendants. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the defendants. Costs at the trial level are to await a determination of this matter.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murdock v. Brittco, Inc.
517 So. 2d 898 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 So. 2d 898, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10368, 1987 WL 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-transportation-development-v-vidrine-lactapp-1987.