State, Department of Revenue v. Roberts
705 So. 2d 1069, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1637, 1998 WL 69074
Opinion
We find that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to enforce payment of the child-support arrearages owed by the former husband. See Ashe v. Ashe, 509 So.2d 1146, 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Livingston v. Livingston, 686 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We, therefore, reverse and remand for farther proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State, Department of Revenue v. Roberts, 705 So. 2d 1069, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1637, 1998 WL 69074 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
705 So. 2d 1069 (State, Department of Revenue v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Livingston v. Livingston
686 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Ashe v. Ashe
509 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)