State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Weeks v. Money

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Weeks v. Money

706 So. 2d 409, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2140, 1998 WL 94148

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1998

DocketNo. 97-3138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 409 (State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Weeks v. Money) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Weeks v. Money, 706 So. 2d 409, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2140, 1998 WL 94148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

WEBSTER, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final order reducing the amount of appellee’s child support arrearage. It argues that it was error (1) to reduce the amount of the arrearage in the absence of either a pleading requesting such action or notice and an opportunity to be heard; and (2) retroactively to reduce the amount of the arrearage absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances compelling such a result. We agree. See, e.g., State Dep’t of Revenue v. Leonardi, 696 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (court cannot modify child support award unless issue is presented by appropriate pleading, with sufficient notice and opportunity to be heard); Ashe v. Ashe, 509 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (absent extraordinary circumstances, court cannot retrospectively cancel or reduce child support arrearage). Accordingly, we reverse the order reducing the amount of appellee’s child support arrearage.

REVERSED.

JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WEBSTER, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final order reducing the amount of appellee’s child support arrearage. It argues that it was error (1) to reduce the amount of the arrearage in the absence of either a pleading requesting such action or notice and an opportunity to be heard; and (2) retroactively to reduce the amount of the arrearage absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances compelling such a result. We agree. See, e.g., State Dep’t of Revenue v. Leonardi, 696 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (court cannot modify child support award unless issue is presented by appropriate pleading, with sufficient notice and opportunity to be heard); Ashe v. Ashe, 509 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (absent extraordinary circumstances, court cannot retrospectively cancel or reduce child support arrearage). Accordingly, we reverse the order reducing the amount of appellee’s child support arrearage.

REVERSED.

JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 So. 2d 409, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2140, 1998 WL 94148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-revenue-ex-rel-weeks-v-money-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack