State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Jones v. Zapata
723 So. 2d 395, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1999 WL 9765
Opinion
We reverse the order on motion for contempt insofar as it modifies the obligor’s [396] arrearage installment payment amount. The modification issue was not raised by appropriate pleadings, and the opponent was not given notice and opportunity to be heard on the issue. See Moody v. Moody, 721 So.2d 731, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); see generally Gibson v. Bennett, 561 So.2d 565 (Fla.1990).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Jones v. Zapata, 723 So. 2d 395, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 203, 1999 WL 9765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
723 So. 2d 395 (State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Jones v. Zapata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moody v. Moody
721 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Gibson v. Bennett
561 So. 2d 565 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)