State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Castillo v. Castillo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Castillo v. Castillo

700 So. 2d 128, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11190

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1997

DocketNo. 97-1807

StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 128 (State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Castillo v. Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Castillo v. Castillo, 700 So. 2d 128, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court finding that Thoro-Clean was not subject to an income deduction order. We affirm, because the argument raised in Appellant’s brief was not presented to the trial court. The record reflects that the trial judge decided the case upon a determination that Appellee was an independent contractor rather than an employee of Tho-ro-Clean. The trial court was not given an opportunity to determine whether Thoro-Clean had an obligation under section 61.1301(l)(b)l, Florida Statutes, to deduct [129]*129from compensation owed to an independent contractor.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court finding that Thoro-Clean was not subject to an income deduction order. We affirm, because the argument raised in Appellant’s brief was not presented to the trial court. The record reflects that the trial judge decided the case upon a determination that Appellee was an independent contractor rather than an employee of Tho-ro-Clean. The trial court was not given an opportunity to determine whether Thoro-Clean had an obligation under section 61.1301(l)(b)l, Florida Statutes, to deduct [129]*129from compensation owed to an independent contractor.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 128, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-revenue-ex-rel-castillo-v-castillo-fladistctapp-1997.