State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Barnhill v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Barnhill v. Smith

176 So. 3d 1289, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843, 2015 WL 6866767

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 2015

DocketNo. 1D15-1587

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 3d 1289 (State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Barnhill v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Barnhill v. Smith, 176 So. 3d 1289, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843, 2015 WL 6866767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Department of Revenue (“DOR”) petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the lower court’s order adopting verbatim the order of the general magistrate granting the father’s motion for genetic testing and ordering the “custodian [1290]*1290to produce the minor child” for said purpose. As did the order in Florida, Department of Revenue ex rel. Corbitt v. Alletag, 156 So.3d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), the order in this case departs from the essential requirements of law because the issue of paternity was not placed in controversy by the father and good cause was not shown for paternity testing. Accord Fla. Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Haye v. Kerr, 155 So.3d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Furthermore, although this cause was initiated by DOR in a proceeding to establish the father’s child support obligation when the child was in the custody of his grandmother, the “custodian” of the child at the time of the hearing before the general magistrate was the child’s mother. As she candidly acknowledged during the hearing, the general magistrate (and, hence, the lower court) lacked personal jurisdiction over the mother to order her to produce the child for testing.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Department of Revenue (“DOR”) petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the lower court’s order adopting verbatim the order of the general magistrate granting the father’s motion for genetic testing and ordering the “custodian [1290]*1290to produce the minor child” for said purpose. As did the order in Florida, Department of Revenue ex rel. Corbitt v. Alletag, 156 So.3d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), the order in this case departs from the essential requirements of law because the issue of paternity was not placed in controversy by the father and good cause was not shown for paternity testing. Accord Fla. Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Haye v. Kerr, 155 So.3d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Furthermore, although this cause was initiated by DOR in a proceeding to establish the father’s child support obligation when the child was in the custody of his grandmother, the “custodian” of the child at the time of the hearing before the general magistrate was the child’s mother. As she candidly acknowledged during the hearing, the general magistrate (and, hence, the lower court) lacked personal jurisdiction over the mother to order her to produce the child for testing.

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 3d 1289, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843, 2015 WL 6866767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-revenue-ex-rel-barnhill-v-smith-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack