State, Department of Legal Affairs v. Rains

654 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5073, 1995 WL 277063
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 1995·No. No. 94-00772·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals the circuit court’s order allowing Billie Jean Rains to [1255]*1255intervene in a distribution of assets from a civil RICO 1 settlement. Because the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the intervention, we affirm.

The standard of review for an order granting a motion to intervene is abuse of discretion. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So.2d 505 (Fla.1992). In this case, Rains claimed an interest in property obtained by the state in a civil RICO settlement. She alleged that the state failed to give her the notice at the time the RICO action was initiated. Based on these allegations, the circuit court granted Rains intervenor status so the validity of her claim could be determined. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in this ruling and therefore we affirm.

The dissent concludes that Rains does not have a valid claim to the sale proceeds. However, the validity of the claim is not at issue. The limited question before this court is whether intervention was properly allowed. After Rains is allowed to intervene, the circuit court can rule on the validity of her claim.

Affirmed.

BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur. PARKER, A.C.J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Department of Legal Affairs v. Rains, 654 So. 2d 1254, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5073, 1995 WL 277063 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1254 (State, Department of Legal Affairs v. Rains) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hausmann Ex Rel. Doe v. LM
806 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)