State, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Boise Cascade Corp.

795 So. 2d 967, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11518, 1998 WL 597860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1998·No. No. 97-4038·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was no legal basis under section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (1973) for the assessment of attorney’s fees against the employer and carrier. Therefore, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees in favor of the claimant.

Moreover, we reject the State’s argument regarding the calculation of the social security offset. In Acker v. City of Clearwater, 755 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), we held that the offset should not be recalculated each year to include the yearly increases in permanent total disability supplemental benefits. As we did in Acker, we certify the following question:

WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?

In all other respects the order of the judge of compensation claims is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Boise Cascade Corp., 795 So. 2d 967, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11518, 1998 WL 597860 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

795 So. 2d 967 (State, Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Boise Cascade Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security v. Boise Cascade Corp.
790 So. 2d 1092 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
HRS DIST. II v. Pickard
778 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)