State Department of Human Rights v. Mitrano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

State Department of Human Rights v. Mitrano

98 A.D.2d 974, 470 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.D.2d 974 (State Department of Human Rights v. Mitrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Department of Human Rights v. Mitrano, 98 A.D.2d 974, 470 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Determination and order unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner, the owner and operator of a restaurant and bar located in Rochester, New York, known as Mitrano’s Restaurant, has instituted this proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated July 22, 1982, affirming an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights dated March 9, 1981 which found petitioner guilty of a discriminatory practice by refusing to hire an applicant for employment on the basis of her sex. Upon our review of the record, we find substantial evidence that petitioner committed a discriminatory act. Thus, the determination and order must be confirmed (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176)..(Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination and order unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner, the owner and operator of a restaurant and bar located in Rochester, New York, known as Mitrano’s Restaurant, has instituted this proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated July 22, 1982, affirming an order of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights dated March 9, 1981 which found petitioner guilty of a discriminatory practice by refusing to hire an applicant for employment on the basis of her sex. Upon our review of the record, we find substantial evidence that petitioner committed a discriminatory act. Thus, the determination and order must be confirmed (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176)..(Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.D.2d 974, 470 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-human-rights-v-mitrano-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack