State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Dean

175 So. 3d 939, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14994, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2289
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2015
DocketNo. 5D15-2038
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 So. 3d 939 (State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Dean, 175 So. 3d 939, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14994, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2289 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

While the lower court applied the wrong standard of law to justify a stop of a motor vehicle — probable cause, rather than reasonable suspicion — we find, under the “tipsy coachman” doctrine, that the trial court reached the proper result and deny the petition for writ of certiorari. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906-07 (Fla.2002).

PETITION DENIED.

EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur. BERGER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Michelle Lynn Howard
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 3d 939, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14994, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-highway-safety-motor-vehicles-v-dean-fladistctapp-2015.