State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Atkinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Atkinson

547 So. 2d 1262, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1937, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4727, 1989 WL 97693

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 16, 1989

DocketNo. 89-681

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 1262 (State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Atkinson, 547 So. 2d 1262, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1937, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4727, 1989 WL 97693 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services appeals an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings that held invalid in part proposed Rule IOC-1.113, Florida Administrative Code-. The hearing officer found that the portion of the proposed rule which required the participation of teenage parents with children more than three months old in an employment and training program exceeded the agency’s authority under section 409.029(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). Now the parties have brought to our attention the enactment of chapters 89-334 and 89-379, Laws of Florida, which authorize the portion of the proposed rule that was held invalid. The parties are in agreement therefore that this appeal is moot, but disagree as to the proper disposition of this cause. We find the appropriate remedy is to vacate the hearing officer’s order and remand to the Division of Administrative Hearings for further appropriate proceedings, Mayo v. Florida Grapefruit Growers Protective Association, 123 Fla. 277, 166 So. 554 (1936).

BOOTH, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services appeals an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings that held invalid in part proposed Rule IOC-1.113, Florida Administrative Code-. The hearing officer found that the portion of the proposed rule which required the participation of teenage parents with children more than three months old in an employment and training program exceeded the agency’s authority under section 409.029(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). Now the parties have brought to our attention the enactment of chapters 89-334 and 89-379, Laws of Florida, which authorize the portion of the proposed rule that was held invalid. The parties are in agreement therefore that this appeal is moot, but disagree as to the proper disposition of this cause. We find the appropriate remedy is to vacate the hearing officer’s order and remand to the Division of Administrative Hearings for further appropriate proceedings, Mayo v. Florida Grapefruit Growers Protective Association, 123 Fla. 277, 166 So. 554 (1936).

BOOTH, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 1262, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1937, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4727, 1989 WL 97693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-v-atkinson-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack