State Council v. Hollywood Council

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State Council v. Hollywood Council

72 A. 24, 75 N.J. Eq. 292, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 277

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 1, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 A. 24 (State Council v. Hollywood Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Council v. Hollywood Council, 72 A. 24, 75 N.J. Eq. 292, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 277 (N.J. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case differs from the case of State Council v. Enterprise Council, decided this day, only in the fact that Hollywood council is an unincorporated association, and derived its permission to organize from the state council of New Jersey instead of the state council of Pennsylvania. We do not think that these facts distinguish the case in any of its essential features from the case of Enterprise council, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree in the present case must be reversed, with costs.

For affirmance—None.' For reversal—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Min-turn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Gray, Djll—15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case differs from the case of State Council v. Enterprise Council, decided this day, only in the fact that Hollywood council is an unincorporated association, and derived its permission to organize from the state council of New Jersey instead of the state council of Pennsylvania. We do not think that these facts distinguish the case in any of its essential features from the case of Enterprise council, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree in the present case must be reversed, with costs.

For affirmance—None.' For reversal—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Min-turn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Vroom, Gray, Djll—15.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A. 24, 75 N.J. Eq. 292, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-council-v-hollywood-council-nj-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack