State Council v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State Council v. Cook

213 S.E.2d 62, 133 Ga. App. 940, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2341

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 30, 1975

Docket50127

StatusPublished

This text of 213 S.E.2d 62 (State Council v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Council v. Cook, 213 S.E.2d 62, 133 Ga. App. 940, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

This case is an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of Richmond County dismissing the appeal for failure to file the transcript of the evidence within the time provided by law. Appellant’s counsel contends that he was not aware that the transcript had not been filed by the court reporter until the time had expired, and had received repeated assurances from the court reporter that the transcript would be available within the statutory period. No request was made for an extension of time. Held:

We affirm. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Dunbar v. Green, 232 Ga. 188 (205 SE2d 854). See also Blackstone v. State, 131 Ga. App. 666 (206 SE2d 553).

Judgment affirmed.

Been, P. J., and Evans, J., concur. Lanier, Powell, Cooper & Cooper, L. Valdi Cooper, Roger W. Dunaway, Jr., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolz, Judge.

This case is an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of Richmond County dismissing the appeal for failure to file the transcript of the evidence within the time provided by law. Appellant’s counsel contends that he was not aware that the transcript had not been filed by the court reporter until the time had expired, and had received repeated assurances from the court reporter that the transcript would be available within the statutory period. No request was made for an extension of time. Held:

We affirm. The case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Dunbar v. Green, 232 Ga. 188 (205 SE2d 854). See also Blackstone v. State, 131 Ga. App. 666 (206 SE2d 553).

Judgment affirmed.

Been, P. J., and Evans, J., concur. Lanier, Powell, Cooper & Cooper, L. Valdi Cooper, Roger W. Dunaway, Jr., for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 S.E.2d 62, 133 Ga. App. 940, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-council-v-cook-gactapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack