State Compen. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.
This text of 2 Cal. 2d 94 (State Compen. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Petitioner,
v.
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, HELEN E. BOHM et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
B. E. Pemberton, Edmund D. Leonard and Ivan A. Schwab for Petitioner.
John Francis Neylan, Grove J. Fink and John B. Connolly, as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Petitioner.
Everett A. Corten, Emmet J. Seawell and Paul C. Dana for Respondents.
THE COURT.
[1] The petition for rehearing herein is denied, for the reason that the deceased employee, at the time of his death, was performing duties arising out of a special employment; and that such special employment was distinct from his ordinary activities, in which he was an independent contractor. *96
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Cal. 2d 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-compen-ins-fund-v-industrial-acc-com-cal-1934.