State Commission Against Discrimination v. Mustachio

New York Supreme Court

State Commission Against Discrimination v. Mustachio

56 Misc. 2d 47, 288 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2895

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 Misc. 2d 47 (State Commission Against Discrimination v. Mustachio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Commission Against Discrimination v. Mustachio, 56 Misc. 2d 47, 288 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2895 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Bernard S. Meter, J.

Petition of the commission for an order of enforcement granted. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and conclusions reached by the Hearing Commissioners. The claim that respondent sold his business and removed from the State after the hearing and before issuance of the Commissioner’s order is irrelevant. The order speaks as of the time of the hearing and if supported by the record may be enforced. This court has jurisdiction even if respondent no longer resides or transacts business in Nassau County, since Nassau is the county in which the unlawful discriminatory practice occurred. The order, which applies to respondent at his shop in Uniondale 11 or any other barber shop operated by respondent within the State of New York ”, should be enforced without modification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bernard S. Meter, J.

Petition of the commission for an order of enforcement granted. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and conclusions reached by the Hearing Commissioners. The claim that respondent sold his business and removed from the State after the hearing and before issuance of the Commissioner’s order is irrelevant. The order speaks as of the time of the hearing and if supported by the record may be enforced. This court has jurisdiction even if respondent no longer resides or transacts business in Nassau County, since Nassau is the county in which the unlawful discriminatory practice occurred. The order, which applies to respondent at his shop in Uniondale 11 or any other barber shop operated by respondent within the State of New York ”, should be enforced without modification.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Misc. 2d 47, 288 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-commission-against-discrimination-v-mustachio-nysupct-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack