State City of Leesville v. Foster

854 So. 2d 971, 2003 WL 21648762
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 11, 2003
DocketNos. KA03-788, KW03-807
StatusPublished

This text of 854 So. 2d 971 (State City of Leesville v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State City of Leesville v. Foster, 854 So. 2d 971, 2003 WL 21648762 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

JjPER CURIAM.

An appeal was lodged with this court pursuant to a motion and order for appeal from a Leesville City Court judgment. Additionally, the Defendant filed a separate writ of review from this same judgment. A review of the record in this matter reveals that Defendant was found guilty of violating a city ordinance.

La.R.S. 13:1896(B) sets forth the jurisdiction for review of criminal cases from a city court. This statute provides that La. Code Crim.P. art. 912.1 applies to all criminal cases tried under a state statute in a city court. In those cases involving trials in a city court on charges other than those involving a violation of a state statute, appeal is to the district court of the parish where the city court is located. Since the conviction currently before the court involves the violation of a city ordinance, the appeal would properly be to Vernon Parish District Court.

14Accordingly, we dismiss both Defendant’s appeal and his writ application.

APPEAL DISMISSED; WRIT DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
854 So. 2d 971, 2003 WL 21648762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-city-of-leesville-v-foster-lactapp-2003.