State Board of Pharmacy v. Lurie

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

State Board of Pharmacy v. Lurie

61 Misc. 71, 112 N.Y.S. 1092

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Misc. 71 (State Board of Pharmacy v. Lurie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Board of Pharmacy v. Lurie, 61 Misc. 71, 112 N.Y.S. 1092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action wás brought to recover a penalty for the violation of chapter 667 of the Laws of 1900. The defendants demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. On May 13, 1908, the demurrer was overruled by one of the justices of the Municipal Court, with leave to plead over upon the payment of ten dollars costs; and the case was set for trial on May 21, 1908. The. action was, by consent, adjourned from May 21, 1908, to May 25, 1908. The defendants did not pay the costs required by the order overruling the demurrer and allowing them to plead over. When the action was called, on May 25, 1908, the defendants were permitted by another justice of the court, against the objection and exception of the plaintiff, to file their answer to the complaint and proceed to trial without paying the costs previously imposed. The defendants’ demurrer having been overruled, judgment could have been entered against them, except for the permission which the court gave them to plead over. This permission was granted upon the express condition that the defendants pay the plaintiff ten dollars costs. The defendants had no right to avail themselves of this permission, unless they complied with the conditions imposed.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, provided that the defendants pay to the plaintiff,, within five days from the service of a copy of the order entered upon this decision, the sum of ten dollars costs. If the defendants shall not comply with the provisions of this order, the answer should be stricken out and judgment absolute entered in favor of [73]*73the plaintiff for the amount to which it was entitled under the complaint or proof, with appropriate costs in the court below and costs of this appeal.

Present: Gildersleeve, MacLean and Seabury, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, provided that defendants pay to plaintiff, within five days from service of copy of order, the sum of ten dollars costs. If defendants shall not comply with order, answer stricken out, and judgment absolute in favor of plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action wás brought to recover a penalty for the violation of chapter 667 of the Laws of 1900. The defendants demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. On May 13, 1908, the demurrer was overruled by one of the justices of the Municipal Court, with leave to plead over upon the payment of ten dollars costs; and the case was set for trial on May 21, 1908. The. action was, by consent, adjourned from May 21, 1908, to May 25, 1908. The defendants did not pay the costs required by the order overruling the demurrer and allowing them to plead over. When the action was called, on May 25, 1908, the defendants were permitted by another justice of the court, against the objection and exception of the plaintiff, to file their answer to the complaint and proceed to trial without paying the costs previously imposed. The defendants’ demurrer having been overruled, judgment could have been entered against them, except for the permission which the court gave them to plead over. This permission was granted upon the express condition that the defendants pay the plaintiff ten dollars costs. The defendants had no right to avail themselves of this permission, unless they complied with the conditions imposed.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, provided that the defendants pay to the plaintiff,, within five days from the service of a copy of the order entered upon this decision, the sum of ten dollars costs. If the defendants shall not comply with the provisions of this order, the answer should be stricken out and judgment absolute entered in favor of [73]*73the plaintiff for the amount to which it was entitled under the complaint or proof, with appropriate costs in the court below and costs of this appeal.

Present: Gildersleeve, MacLean and Seabury, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, provided that defendants pay to plaintiff, within five days from service of copy of order, the sum of ten dollars costs. If defendants shall not comply with order, answer stricken out, and judgment absolute in favor of plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Misc. 71, 112 N.Y.S. 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-pharmacy-v-lurie-nyappterm-1908.