State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maxwell

181 A. 694, 13 N.J. Misc. 855, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 200
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 5, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 181 A. 694 (State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Maxwell, 181 A. 694, 13 N.J. Misc. 855, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 200 (N.J. 1935).

Opinion

Pei? Curiam.

Prosecutor was convicted of a violation of an act to regulate the practice of medicine. Section 8 of Pamph. L. 1894, p. 458; 1 Comp. Stat., § 35, p. 3329, provides who shall be regarded as practitioners of medicine. The defendant did not prescribe drugs or material remedy. He sold a book entitled “Eternal Wisdom and Health.” He maintained a store in Atlantic City with seats arranged in rows. He spoke of the infinite spiritual forces which illuminate the body with the principles of truth, love and light. He preached [856]*856the triumph of the mind over the ills of the body and the power of the will to drive out disease. He told his patients to sit erect, feet firmly on the floor and will themselves to feel the forces which he talked of which would drive out the ills they told him of. Obviously that which he did was not the practice of medicine, because the act mentioned above was amended (Pamph. L. 1921, pp. 702, 707; Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1911-1924, pp. 1867 et seq., §§ 127-31 et seq.), so as to exempt from the provisions of section 8 those who administered to the sick or suffering by prayers or spiritual means without the use of drug or material remedy. The philosophy which the defendant sought to teach was the power of the mind over the ills of the body. He used neither drug or material remedy. He told those who came to him how to sit and think and gave them assurances of the cure of every ailment by such means. Such act clearly came within the exceptions of the 1921 amendment.

The conviction will be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A. 694, 13 N.J. Misc. 855, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-medical-examiners-v-maxwell-nj-1935.