State Board of Medical Examiners v. Dussinger
This text of 154 A. 325 (State Board of Medical Examiners v. Dussinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of certiorari in this case brings up for review a determination of the Eirst District Court of the city of Newark, that the defendant had not violated section 10 of an act to regulate the practice of medicine. Pamph. L. 1894, p. 454, as amended.
The District Court judge found that there were no electrical treatments given. The signs displayed indicated that the place was a gymnasium where baths and massage were given. The devices employed were baths, heat, massage and an electrical vibrator, together with heat from a sun ray lamp.
After carefully examining the whole record, we reach the conclusion that the evidence supports the findings of the court below.
The writ will, therefore, be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A. 325, 9 N.J. Misc. 423, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-medical-examiners-v-dussinger-nj-1931.