State Board of Law Examiners v. Thoen
This text of 144 N.W. 1135 (State Board of Law Examiners v. Thoen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent Carl A. Thoen, a duly licensed and practicing attorney of this state, was on the eleventh day of October, 1913, duly convicted in the district court of Hennepin county of the crime of forgery and sentenced to imprisonment in the state reformatory for a term of years. Thereupon the Board of Law Examiners caused this proceeding to be instituted for his disbarment. After consideration of the record we find the allegations of the petition true. It is there[530]*530fore ordered that respondent Carl A. Thoen be. and he is removed from his office as an attorney and counsellor in the courts of this state, and that the license heretofore issued to him be and the same is hereby annulled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 N.W. 1135, 124 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-law-examiners-v-thoen-minn-1913.