State Board of Law Examiners v. Reineke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State Board of Law Examiners v. Reineke

144 N.W. 1134, 124 Minn. 528, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 516

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 12, 1913·No. No. 18,560·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent Christian A. Reineke, a duly licensed and practicing attorney of this state, was on the eleventh day of October, 1913, duly convicted in the district court of Hennepin county of the crime of forgery and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for a term of years. Thereupon the Board of Law Examiners caused this proceeding to be instituted for his disbarment. After consideration of the record we find the allegations of the petition true. It is therefore ordered that respondent Christian A. Reineke be and he is removed from his office as an attorney and counsellor in the courts of this state, and that the license heretofore issued to him be and the same is hereby annulled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent Christian A. Reineke, a duly licensed and practicing attorney of this state, was on the eleventh day of October, 1913, duly convicted in the district court of Hennepin county of the crime of forgery and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for a term of years. Thereupon the Board of Law Examiners caused this proceeding to be instituted for his disbarment. After consideration of the record we find the allegations of the petition true. It is therefore ordered that respondent Christian A. Reineke be and he is removed from his office as an attorney and counsellor in the courts of this state, and that the license heretofore issued to him be and the same is hereby annulled.

State Board of Law Examiners v. Reineke, 144 N.W. 1134, 124 Minn. 528, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 516 (Mich. 1913).

Pincite

144 N.W. 1134 (State Board of Law Examiners v. Reineke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related