State Board of Law Examiners v. Giantvalley

143 N.W. 1135, 123 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 473
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 14, 1913
DocketNos. 18,254—(18)
StatusPublished

This text of 143 N.W. 1135 (State Board of Law Examiners v. Giantvalley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Board of Law Examiners v. Giantvalley, 143 N.W. 1135, 123 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 473 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The State Board of Law Examiners made charges against the defendant and asked his disbarment. Defendant answered, and testimony was taken before a referee and reported to the court. The matter was duly heard. The court finds defendant guilty, in that he was convicted of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, to-wit: Causing the publication of advertisements soliciting divorce business in violation of R. L. 1905, § 5166. It is ordered that defendant be suspended from practice as an attorney-at-law in the courts of this state for a period of one year from the filing hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.W. 1135, 123 Minn. 529, 1913 Minn. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-board-of-law-examiners-v-giantvalley-minn-1913.