State Bank v. Bush
225 N.W. 307, 55 S.D. 190, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 143
Opinion
Appellant objects to reorganization of respondent bank on the same grounds relied on by appellants in Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Tomlinson (S. D.) 225 N. W. 305, and Smith v. Texley (S. D.) 225 N. W. 307, and appeals from an order authorizing reinstatement of the reorganized bank as a solvent bank.
The claim of appellant accrued after chapter 104, Laws of 1925, went into effect.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Bank v. Bush, 225 N.W. 307, 55 S.D. 190, 1929 S.D. LEXIS 143 (S.D. 1929).
225 N.W. 307 (State Bank v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American State Savings Bank v. City of Lansing
267 N.W. 895 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1936)
Ex Parte Tennessee Valley Bank
166 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
In Re Mechanics Trust Co.
181 A. 423 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Dunn v. Love
155 So. 331 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)
Timmons v. Peoples Trust Co.
173 S.E. 79 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1934)
Sueltz v. Bank of Hazelton
238 N.W. 649 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1931)
Bush v. Lien
234 N.W. 29 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1930)