STATE BANK OF TEXAS v. KAANAM, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in STATE BANK OF TEXAS v. KAANAM, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 2014·No. CA 13-01126·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

553 CA 13-01126 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

STATE BANK OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAANAM, LLC, DEFENDANT, MILIND K. OZA AND NAYNA M. OZA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LAW OFFICE OF CARL E. PERSON, NEW YORK CITY (CARL E. PERSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MORRISROE HEBERT LLP, BUFFALO (RICHARD J. MORRISROE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered September 25, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendants Milind K. Oza and Nayna M. Oza seeking, inter alia, leave to renew.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in State Bank of Texas v Kaanam, LLC ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STATE BANK OF TEXAS v. KAANAM, LLC, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

STATE BANK OF TEXAS v. KAANAM, LLC (STATE BANK OF TEXAS v. KAANAM, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.