State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel

New Mexico Supreme Court

State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel

202 P. 1118, 27 N.M. 511

New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1921·No. No. 2582·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

DAVIS, J.

The material facts in this case are identical with those in Morrison v. Crisp, 27 N. M. 380, 202 Pac. 123, decided at the present term. The same defense of lack of consideration was pleaded to the note sued upon, and the same law applies. That decision governs this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is so ordered.

RAYNOLDS, C. J., and PARKER, J.,-concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT.

DAVIS, J.

The material facts in this case are identical with those in Morrison v. Crisp, 27 N. M. 380, 202 Pac. 123, decided at the present term. The same defense of lack of consideration was pleaded to the note sued upon, and the same law applies. That decision governs this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is so ordered.

RAYNOLDS, C. J., and PARKER, J.,-concur.

State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel, 202 P. 1118, 27 N.M. 511 (N.M. 1921).

Pincite

202 P. 1118 (State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related