State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel
202 P. 1118, 27 N.M. 511
This text of 202 P. 1118 (State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel, 202 P. 1118, 27 N.M. 511 (N.M. 1921).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT.
The material facts in this case are identical with those in Morrison v. Crisp, 27 N. M. 380, 202 Pac. 123, decided at the present term. The same defense of lack of consideration was pleaded to the note sued upon, and the same law applies. That decision governs this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Morrison v. Crisp
202 P. 123 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
202 P. 1118, 27 N.M. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-bank-of-commerce-v-speidel-nm-1921.