State Bank of Commerce v. Smith
253 A.D. 870, 2 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8979
Opinion
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the Special Term with directions to proceed as indicated in Heiman v. Bishop (272 N. Y. 83). All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a deficiency judgment.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Bank of Commerce v. Smith, 253 A.D. 870, 2 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
253 A.D. 870 (State Bank of Commerce v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heiman v. Bishop
4 N.E.2d 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)