STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. Sherman
737 N.W.2d 692
Opinion
STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Michael SHERMAN and Procom Towers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and
Monticello Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2006 judgment *693 of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. Sherman, 737 N.W.2d 692 (Mich. 2007).
737 N.W.2d 692 (STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.