State and Co-Relators v. City of Avon Park

144 So. 306, 108 Fla. 640
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 10, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on tos be heard upon the demurrer of the relators to the respondent’s answer, as *641 well as demurrers to portions of the answer and motion to strike portions of the answer, it is the judgment of the Court that the demurrer to the respondent’s answer should be and the same is hereby sustained, upon the authority of the case of State ex rel. Davis, Attorney General, et al., v. City of Stuart, 97 Fla. 69, .120 So. 335. It is so ordered.

This ruling makes it unnecessary to pass upon said demurrers to portions of the answer and said motion to strike portions of the answer.

It is¡ further ordered that the respondent be given leave to file an amended answer within 20 days from this date.

Demurrer to answer sustained.

Buford, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur.

Davis, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State and Co-Relators v. City of Avon Park, 144 So. 306, 108 Fla. 640 (Fla. 1932).

144 So. 306 (State and Co-Relators v. City of Avon Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sparkman v. Carter
43 Fla. Supp. 107 (Brevard County Circuit Court, 1975)
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park
149 So. 409 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)