Stasz v. Gonzalez (In re Stasz)

Ninth Circuit

Stasz v. Gonzalez (In re Stasz)

348 F. App'x 233

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 2009

DocketNo. 08-56054

StatusPublished

This text of 348 F. App'x 233 (Stasz v. Gonzalez (In re Stasz)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stasz v. Gonzalez (In re Stasz), 348 F. App'x 233 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Shanel Ann Stasz, a Chapter 7 debtor, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing as moot her appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order granting the trustee’s motion to sell Stasz’s condominium to pay off creditors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s conclusion that the appeal is moot, Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc., v. Stanley (In re Nat’l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc.), 152 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the appeal as moot because the property at issue had been sold to a third-party good faith purchaser, and the court was no longer able to fashion an effective remedy. See id. (affirming dismissal on mootness grounds where property at issue was sold and court could not grant effective relief).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI