Stasyszn v. Sutton East Associates

New York Court of Appeals

Stasyszn v. Sutton East Associates

659 N.E.2d 764, 86 N.Y.2d 869, 635 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 4369

DecidedOctober 26, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 659 N.E.2d 764 (Stasyszn v. Sutton East Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stasyszn v. Sutton East Associates, 659 N.E.2d 764, 86 N.Y.2d 869, 635 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 4369 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed plaintiff’s appeal from that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied her motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Ciparick taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed plaintiff’s appeal from that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied her motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Ciparick taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 N.E.2d 764, 86 N.Y.2d 869, 635 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 4369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stasyszn-v-sutton-east-associates-ny-1995.