Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland

539 N.E.2d 633, 43 Ohio St. 3d 612, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 103
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 14, 1989·No. No. 88-1220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland, 539 N.E.2d 633, 43 Ohio St. 3d 612, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 103 (Ohio 1989).

539 N.E.2d 633 (Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jurek v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board
651 N.E.2d 3 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)