Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland

539 N.E.2d 633, 43 Ohio St. 3d 612, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 103
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 14, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 539 N.E.2d 633 (Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stasiuk v. City of Cleveland, 539 N.E.2d 633, 43 Ohio St. 3d 612, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 103 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jurek v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board
651 N.E.2d 3 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 N.E.2d 633, 43 Ohio St. 3d 612, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stasiuk-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-1989.