Stasio v. O & L Equipment, Inc.
172 A.D.2d 1069, 571 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 1991
StatusPublished
This text of 172 A.D.2d 1069 (Stasio v. O & L Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stasio v. O & L Equipment, Inc., 172 A.D.2d 1069, 571 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Sullivan v Joy Mfg. Co., 70 NY2d 806; Vermette v Kenworth Truck Co., 68 NY2d 714). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co.
497 N.E.2d 680 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Sullivan v. Joy Manufacturing Co.
517 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 1069, 571 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stasio-v-o-l-equipment-inc-nyappdiv-1991.