Stasel v. Daugherty
This text of 7 Ohio N.P. 424 (Stasel v. Daugherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Licking County Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally).
This case is submitted to the court upon the pleadings and the evidence. I might say that there is,, substantially, an agreed statement of facts in the case.
This is a suit brought by Stasel, as receiver, v. Daugherty to recover on a promissory note. Daugherty files an answer setting up what is claimed to be a set-off, he having been a depositor in the bank of which Stasel is receiver. That deposit is in the name of Daugherty, as executor of Hickey.
The question is whether Daugherty has a right to set off this claim which he has' against the bank as executor.
The court does not think he has, and there may be a judgment for the plaintiff. Motion for new trial overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ohio N.P. 424, 7 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stasel-v-daugherty-ohctcompllickin-1907.