Stasan, Inc. v. Arter & Hadden, L.L.P.

Eleventh Circuit

Stasan, Inc. v. Arter & Hadden, L.L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 2006

Docket05-10842

StatusUnpublished

This text of Stasan, Inc. v. Arter & Hadden, L.L.P. (Stasan, Inc. v. Arter & Hadden, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stasan, Inc. v. Arter & Hadden, L.L.P., (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2006 No. 05-10842 THOMAS K. KAHN ________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 01-07258-CV-KAM

STASAN, INC., RICHARD BLUMBERG,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

ARTER & HADDEN, L.L.P.,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________

(March 9, 2006)

Before BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges and MILLS *, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

* Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois. After careful consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties, having

entertained oral argument and a review of the Order of the Honorable Kenneth A.

Marra, United States District Judge, dated 27 January 2005, we find no error in that

order. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI