Started Pullets, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Started Pullets, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.

24 A.D.2d 701, 261 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3464

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 701 (Started Pullets, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Started Pullets, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 24 A.D.2d 701, 261 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam.

In this action to foreclose a mortgage, Special Term, upon defendant’s motion, directed the joinder as parties defendant of persons who previously commenced an action, still pending, to declare void this same mortgage. The issues sought to be raised by appellant, whether prematurely or not, relate to the merits of the respective actions and to supposed equitable and other defenses thereto and were correctly disposed of by Special Term, for purposes of the motion, at least. Those of the proposed additional defendants who were heard on the motion consented to the joinder. Neither appellant nor anyone else questions the propriety of the joinder under [702]*702the broad provisions and liberal intendment of section 1311 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. Order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam.

In this action to foreclose a mortgage, Special Term, upon defendant’s motion, directed the joinder as parties defendant of persons who previously commenced an action, still pending, to declare void this same mortgage. The issues sought to be raised by appellant, whether prematurely or not, relate to the merits of the respective actions and to supposed equitable and other defenses thereto and were correctly disposed of by Special Term, for purposes of the motion, at least. Those of the proposed additional defendants who were heard on the motion consented to the joinder. Neither appellant nor anyone else questions the propriety of the joinder under [702]*702the broad provisions and liberal intendment of section 1311 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. Order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 701, 261 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/started-pullets-inc-v-ralston-purina-co-nyappdiv-1965.