Starr v. State

88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 145, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 183
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1916
Docket7343
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 918 (Starr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starr v. State, 88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 145, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 183 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

There was no eye-witness to the homicide, and there were some circumstances so strongly indicating a mutual intent to fight, and a mutual combat, as to authorize the instructions of the court upon the subject of voluntary manslaughter, as well as to warrant the verdict of that offense; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 145, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-state-gactapp-1916.