Starr v. Page
This text of 1968 OK CR 80 (Starr v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an Original Proceeding filed by the petitioner in which he alleges he was not adequately represented by counsel, and most particularly in reference to advising him as to his right to an appeal.
Petitioner attached to his petition the transcript of the proceedings before the District Court, and this writer is amazed that said petitioner could expect this Court to read this record and determine that the allegations raised in' his petition are true. The record speaks for itself. We will not recite it here. Suffice it to say that the defendant was not denied any of his Constitutional rights.
The writ (intended to be for Post-Conviction Appeal) is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1968 OK CR 80, 440 P.2d 993, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-page-oklacrimapp-1968.