Starr v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Starr v. Page

1968 OK CR 80, 440 P.2d 993, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 315

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 1, 1968·No. No. A-14581·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge.

This is an Original Proceeding filed by the petitioner in which he alleges he was not adequately represented by counsel, and most particularly in reference to advising him as to his right to an appeal.

Petitioner attached to his petition the transcript of the proceedings before the District Court, and this writer is amazed that said petitioner could expect this Court to read this record and determine that the allegations raised in' his petition are true. The record speaks for itself. We will not recite it here. Suffice it to say that the defendant was not denied any of his Constitutional rights.

The writ (intended to be for Post-Conviction Appeal) is hereby denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge.

This is an Original Proceeding filed by the petitioner in which he alleges he was not adequately represented by counsel, and most particularly in reference to advising him as to his right to an appeal.

Petitioner attached to his petition the transcript of the proceedings before the District Court, and this writer is amazed that said petitioner could expect this Court to read this record and determine that the allegations raised in' his petition are true. The record speaks for itself. We will not recite it here. Suffice it to say that the defendant was not denied any of his Constitutional rights.

The writ (intended to be for Post-Conviction Appeal) is hereby denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Starr v. Page, 1968 OK CR 80, 440 P.2d 993, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 315 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

1968 OK CR 80 (Starr v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.