Starr v. McNeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Starr v. McNeal

97 A. 943, 253 Pa. 98, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 790

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 20, 1916

DocketAppeal, No. 399

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 A. 943 (Starr v. McNeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starr v. McNeal, 97 A. 943, 253 Pa. 98, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 790 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This action is upon an award of an arbitrator under a common law submission. The terms of submission, signed by the appellant, are plain and unambiguous, and, as the arbitrator clearly acted within the scope of the authority committed to him, his award is “with no right of appeal” in the appellant. The averments in his affidavit of defense are unavailing to defeat the appellee’s right to recover. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This action is upon an award of an arbitrator under a common law submission. The terms of submission, signed by the appellant, are plain and unambiguous, and, as the arbitrator clearly acted within the scope of the authority committed to him, his award is “with no right of appeal” in the appellant. The averments in his affidavit of defense are unavailing to defeat the appellee’s right to recover. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A. 943, 253 Pa. 98, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-mcneal-pa-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack