Starr v. Maupin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Starr v. Maupin

108 P. 848, 82 Kan. 859, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMay 7, 1910

DocketNo. 16,523

StatusPublished

This text of 108 P. 848 (Starr v. Maupin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starr v. Maupin, 108 P. 848, 82 Kan. 859, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 361 (kan 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Giving to the evidence the strongest interpretation of which it is susceptible in the plaintiff’s favor, it is legally insufficent to establish want of legal capacity. This being true the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Likewise the charges of fraud and undue influence were not proved. Part of the rejected evidence was improper and the remainder was sufficiently covered by other questions and answers.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Giving to the evidence the strongest interpretation of which it is susceptible in the plaintiff’s favor, it is legally insufficent to establish want of legal capacity. This being true the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Likewise the charges of fraud and undue influence were not proved. Part of the rejected evidence was improper and the remainder was sufficiently covered by other questions and answers.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 P. 848, 82 Kan. 859, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-maupin-kan-1910.