Starr v. Harrington

1 Ind. 515
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ind. 515 (Starr v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starr v. Harrington, 1 Ind. 515 (Ind. 1849).

Opinion

SLANDER. Charge complained of, perjury. The declaration alleges that there was a suit in the Porter Cir[516]*516cuit Court by Jesse Raby against Ruel Starr; that, on the trial of that suit, Thomas K. Harrington, the plaintiff in this suit, was a witness, and that he swore that the said Ruel Starr had said of the said Jesse Raby, “ he (said Raby meaning) stole my wheat, (meaning said Starr's wheat,) and I (meaning said Starr) can prove it;” that afterwards said Starr, in speaking of the said statement of the said Harrington as such witness, said he (said Harrington meaning) swore to a damned lie, and I can prove it,” meaning thereby that said Harrington (the plaintiff in this suit) had committed perjury, &c. Upon this charge this suit is brought. The defendant, Starr, pleaded to this suit, in justification — 1. That the plaintiff {Harrington) did, by the statement set out in the declaration, which said Harrington made on said trial, commit perjury; 2. That, by another and different statement, which he made in another part of his evidence on said trial, he committed perjury. A general demurrer was sustained to these pleas, and the plaintiff had judgment. We think the first plea good, and the second bad. The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ind. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-harrington-ind-1849.