Starr v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Starr v. City of New York

277 A.D.2d 910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 910 (Starr v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starr v. City of New York, 277 A.D.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs appeal from an order entered on the 23rd day of March, 1950, as resettled, and from the resettled order entered on the 6th day of April, 1950. They appeal from so much of the resettled order as sets aside jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs unless they consent to reductions in the amounts thereof from the sum of $8,500 in favor of plaintiff Eva Starr, to $5,000, and from the sum of $5,000 in favor of plaintiff Sam Starr, to $2,500. The defendant appeals from the order of resettlement insofar as it extends the time of plaintiffs to consent to reduction of the verdict and denies its motion to set aside the verdict. Resettled order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs appeal from an order entered on the 23rd day of March, 1950, as resettled, and from the resettled order entered on the 6th day of April, 1950. They appeal from so much of the resettled order as sets aside jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs unless they consent to reductions in the amounts thereof from the sum of $8,500 in favor of plaintiff Eva Starr, to $5,000, and from the sum of $5,000 in favor of plaintiff Sam Starr, to $2,500. The defendant appeals from the order of resettlement insofar as it extends the time of plaintiffs to consent to reduction of the verdict and denies its motion to set aside the verdict. Resettled order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.