Starr v. Arena
This text of 8 A.D.3d 258 (Starr v. Arena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated April 30, 2003, which denied their motion to compel compliance with a subpoena duces tecum.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to compel compliance with the subpoena duces tecum (see Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042 [1993]; Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 258, 777 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-v-arena-nyappdiv-2004.