Starr & Smith v. Benedict & Richardson
19 Johns. 455
This text of 19 Johns. 455 (Starr & Smith v. Benedict & Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Starr & Smith v. Benedict & Richardson, 19 Johns. 455 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).
Opinion
The cause must take its course. We cannot listen to the suggestion of the counsel, as ground for putting off the argument. If the cause should be set down for the next week, the counsel, for aught we may know, may be engaged in some other Court, and ask for a further postponement.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starr-smith-v-benedict-richardson-nysupct-1822.