Starr Piano Company v. . Sammak
139 N.E. 737, 235 N.Y. 566, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1294
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Last part of question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Starr Piano Company v. . Sammak, 139 N.E. 737, 235 N.Y. 566, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1294 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 737 (Starr Piano Company v. . Sammak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cleaners Products Supply, Inc. v. Garcia
165 Misc. 2d 365 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1995)
Streamlight, Inc. v. International Health & Safety Corp. (In Re Streamlight, Inc.)
108 B.R. 505 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1989)
Murdock v. Plymouth Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Curtina International, Inc.)
23 B.R. 969 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Thorndike & Hix Lobster Co. v. Hall
132 Misc. 723 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)