Starr Piano Co. Sales Corporation v. Woodson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Starr Piano Co. Sales Corporation v. Woodson

154 So. 119, 26 Ala. App. 115, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 49

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 1934

Docket6 Div. 591.

StatusPublished

This text of 154 So. 119 (Starr Piano Co. Sales Corporation v. Woodson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Starr Piano Co. Sales Corporation v. Woodson, 154 So. 119, 26 Ala. App. 115, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 49 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

This was a suit in detinue by appellant to recover a piano from appellee. Verdict and judgment went for appellee.

Appellant had given bond and was in possession of the piano in suit.

Upon the trial, before a jury, the verdict was, simply; “We the jury find for the defendant,” with judgment accordingly.

The value of the piano and damages should have been assessed (Code 1923, § 7392); but appellant cannot be heard to complain of the omission. It was not harmed. Kirkland v. Eford, 205 Ala. 72, 87 So. 364; and especially, International Harvester Co. of America v. Pittman et al., 226 Ala. 355, 147 So. 144. Code 1923, § 7318.

No other question is presented for our consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI