Starosta v. Pedzik

80 N.Y.2d 970
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 29, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 N.Y.2d 970 (Starosta v. Pedzik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Starosta v. Pedzik, 80 N.Y.2d 970 (N.Y. 1992).

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.Y.2d 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starosta-v-pedzik-ny-1992.