Starnes v. State
This text of 101 N.E.2d 272 (Starnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for writ of certiorari, in which he names the State of Indiana as the sole respondent. We have examined the petition and so far as we can determine, it seems to be a petition for writ of mandate to compel certain action by the Allen Circuit Court.
[34]*34The relief sought, therefore, relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but since it wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35, the issuance of the writ must be denied.
So ordered.
Note.—Reported in 101 N. E. 2d 272.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 N.E.2d 272, 230 Ind. 33, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/starnes-v-state-ind-1951.