Starnes v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Starnes v. State

101 N.E.2d 272, 230 Ind. 33, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 210

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 1951·No. No. 28,847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for writ of certiorari, in which he names the State of Indiana as the sole respondent. We have examined the petition and so far as we can determine, it seems to be a petition for writ of mandate to compel certain action by the Allen Circuit Court.

[34] The relief sought, therefore, relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but since it wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35, the issuance of the writ must be denied.

So ordered.

Note.—Reported in 101 N. E. 2d 272.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The relator, appearing pro se, files what he designates as a verified petition for writ of certiorari, in which he names the State of Indiana as the sole respondent. We have examined the petition and so far as we can determine, it seems to be a petition for writ of mandate to compel certain action by the Allen Circuit Court.

[34] The relief sought, therefore, relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but since it wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35, the issuance of the writ must be denied.

So ordered.

Note.—Reported in 101 N. E. 2d 272.

Starnes v. State, 101 N.E.2d 272, 230 Ind. 33, 1951 Ind. LEXIS 210 (Ind. 1951).

Pincite

101 N.E.2d 272 (Starnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related